Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Announcement:June release 118.6 - Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
My Items are getting stuck in hangars in Citadels since this patch was released. I can't grab my stuff on any of my toons that i put in certain hangars.
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.07.14 03:55:50
|
2. EVE Live DPS Graph (desktop application) - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Thanks for the update. Unfortunately, I still get the same error. Seems to be a problem on my part. I decided to upload the full log to dropbox, if you don't mind taking a look. Thanks. Error Log
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.07.09 01:04:26
|
3. EVE Live DPS Graph (desktop application) - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Grauth Thorner wrote: Jessie McPewpew wrote: Hello, i'm getting java errors even after updating java. That's not good could you please provide me some more information? Things I would be interested in: - What errors are you getting, if ...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.07.01 02:01:25
|
4. EVE Live DPS Graph (desktop application) - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Hello, i'm getting java errors even after updating java.
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.27 20:42:46
|
5. Sleeper Capital Ships - in Wormholes [original thread]
Apollo Arithmos can be classified as a captial ship, if you take its tank and ewar capabilities into account.
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.24 23:34:51
|
6. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Shalashaska Adam wrote: Increasing the number of charges for the secondary attack just makes the whole using of it more monotonous. The secondary attack needs to remain high alpha, low number of shots, that is what made it interesting. All th...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.22 23:06:36
|
7. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Khan Wrenth wrote: Jessie McPewpew wrote: Mike Right wrote: carriers are so **** after the patch their damage dealt in pvp spiked up by 350%?? less crying about ticks and dank instapops and more NERFING plz https://i.imgur.com/SRnIFFA.p...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.21 03:58:13
|
8. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mike Right wrote: carriers are so **** after the patch their damage dealt in pvp spiked up by 350%?? less crying about ticks and dank instapops and more NERFING plz https://i.imgur.com/SRnIFFA.png You sound like someone who would go to neb...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.21 01:19:12
|
9. Sticky:[Citadel] Capital Escalations and Drifter Boss - in Wormholes [original thread]
Delt0r Garsk wrote: Tsukino Stareine wrote: So can we talk about how this change utterly failed to address the biggest problem with the old escalations? I just don't understand the design philosophy anymore honestly. That is because your ...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.20 23:12:02
|
10. Sticky:[Citadel] Capital Escalations and Drifter Boss - in Wormholes [original thread]
Tsukino Stareine wrote: So can we talk about how this change utterly failed to address the biggest problem with the old escalations? Aka solo hero dread. This is still extremely doable and all these changes have done is hurt the people who wa...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.19 11:49:32
|
11. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Jessie McPewpew wrote: Actually, the primary weapon is subject to weapon resolution and sucks arse when shooting small stuff. How small is "small stuff" though? Battlecruiser? Cruiser? Destroyer? Frigate? At a cer...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.16 18:47:09
|
12. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Skyler Hawk wrote: Morrigan LeSante wrote: These are extremely low numbers. Particularly dismaying are the sub battleship fleet hulls regularly seen. Obviously support can be factored in, but out of the box for a carrier using two of the on...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.16 17:17:04
|
13. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Skia Aumer wrote: Wow, the flood of tears in this thread is amazing. 1. "Dreads are so much better!" No they are not. Dreads are stationary, carriers are mobile. Carriers can receive reps, dreads not. Dreads can be trackdised, fighters can be ...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.15 20:08:05
|
14. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Miss 'Assassination' Cayman wrote: My math wasn't precise for the 15%; doing the math again it looks more like 11% less paper DPS while the missile attack still has ammo. The cycle time effectively went from 19 secon...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.15 17:02:13
|
15. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
WTH is with this explosion radius? Please make it similar to that of heavy missiles. This is ridiculous. No one flies heavy missile ships but you want us to be flying torpedos that are restricted to bombers and golems with a bilion tps.
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.15 16:36:34
|
16. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lyron-Baktos wrote: Siege Mode's bonus to Weapon Disruption Resistance & Sensor Dampener Resistance has been reduced (T1: 60%, T2: 70%) What is the impact of this? It means your locking range can be reduced to sh**
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.15 02:46:59
|
17. On grid boosters - Discussion Topic - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Making links a targetted module is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. You might as well bring another dps or logi/support. Offgrid links work because it's a boring arse role to play unless you are a fleet commander, and then, you are only beggin...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.15 02:11:45
|
18. Carrier Aggro - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Robertina Palazzo wrote: Serendipity Lost wrote: This seems unfair. AI isn't supposed to be intelligent, it's just a saying. The guys promised me virtual afk carrier ratting. I put in a petition and a bug report. It cant' be working as in...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.11 14:10:13
|
19. Nerf Networked Sensor Arrays - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Tsukino Stareine wrote: one terrible pilot in a super that does not understand how to recall fighters does not make NSA balanced. If OPs claims are true then there won't be that many bombers on multiple carrier kill mails. They would simply e...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.06 22:12:32
|
20. Medium Assembly Array on SiSi (WIP) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I hope this will totally fix the issue of roles affecting who can and can't do indy in corp without everyone freaking out because their stuff might not be safe. It's one of the few things that has infuriated me for a long time as it pretty much ha...
- by Jessie McPewpew - at 2016.06.06 06:19:54
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |